首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Contextual influence on evaluation capacity building in a rapidly changing environment under new governmental policies
Affiliation:1. Department of Education, National Taipei University of Education, Taiwan;2. Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan, Taiwan;1. Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, The Pennsylvania State University, 402 Marion Place, University Park, PA 16802, USA;2. School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, 410 Waldo Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA;3. Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology and Education, The Pennsylvania State University, 107 Ferguson Bldg, University Park, PA 16802, USA;1. CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC, 1433 Epidémiologie Clinique, F-54000 Nancy, France;2. Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France;1. Office of Medical Education, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States;2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States;3. The Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, United States
Abstract:Evaluation capacity building (ECB) is a context-dependent process. Contextual factors affecting ECB implementation have been explored theoretically and practically, but their influence within a changing environment has seldom been discussed. This study examined essential context-sensitive parameters, particularly those involved in implementing new governmental policies regarding higher education. Taiwan was used as a case study for exploring the effect of contextual change on ECB attributes from the perspectives of training receivers and providers. Surveys and interviews were used for data collection and importance–performance analysis was applied for data analysis. Four prominent features were identified. First, the ECB attributes perceived as important by receivers were performed adequately, whereas those perceived as less important were performed less well. Second, under new policies, training provider designed training covering a wide range of ECB, whereas receivers focused on those can be directly applied in evaluation process. Third, in a small education system such as Taiwan’s, the complexity of peer review is high and ethical issues become important. Fourth, because the evaluation structure has been changed from single- to dual-track, receivers expect more training for institution staff, whereas providers insist on hierarchical training. Aligning ECB supply and needs is paramount for adaptation to new policies.
Keywords:Higher education  Evaluation capacity building  Context-dependent process  Contextual influence  Importance-performance analysis
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号