首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

哈奇森、休谟、边沁与哲学功利主义的兴起
引用本文:汶红涛. 哈奇森、休谟、边沁与哲学功利主义的兴起[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014, 0(3): 62-67
作者姓名:汶红涛
作者单位:长安大学政治与行政学院,陕西西安710064
基金项目:国家社科基金资助项目休谟政治哲学与苏格兰启蒙运动(13CZX048);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(名称苏格兰启蒙运动的价值与反思)。
摘    要:休谟在哈奇森道德感理论的基础上进一步发展了情感主义的道德观点:道德的基础在于"情感",而道德判定的标准在于行为和品格所引起的"愉悦性"和"效用性"。这一观点为后来以边沁为代表的哲学功利主义的兴起提供了直接性的理论基础和理论框架,休谟也因此在这一过程中起到了极为重要的过渡意义。但不同于功利主义者在目的—效用意义上对"功利"概念的运用,休谟的"效用"概念仅限于手段意义。休谟促成了哲学功利主义的兴起,但他并未成为一个功利主义者。

关 键 词:哈奇森  休谟  效用  边沁  功利主义

Hutcheson,Hume,Bentham and The Rise of Philosophical Utilitarianism
Wen Hongtao. Hutcheson,Hume,Bentham and The Rise of Philosophical Utilitarianism[J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University Edition of Social Siences, 2014, 0(3): 62-67
Authors:Wen Hongtao
Affiliation:Wen Hongtao ( College of politics and Administration, Chang' an University, Xi' an710064, China)
Abstract:Hume further developed the emotivism moral values on the basis of the theory of Hutcheson’ moral sense.He located the moral judgments on the basis of emotion,and the criteria of morality on pleasure and utility brought about from acts and characters.Hume plays an important role as a pioneer since he paves the way for Bentham’s philosophical utilitarianism with its foundation and structure.Nevertheless,he differs from utilitarianisms in the view of utility on its purpose—utility sense,for he puts this notion within the limit of instrument,and thus stays away from the latter,albeit he facilitates the philosophical utilitarianism.
Keywords:Hutcheson  Hume  utility  Bentham  utilitarianism
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号