首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

传播学科的兴起:一段重新阐释的历史
引用本文:胡翼青. 传播学科的兴起:一段重新阐释的历史[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 9(1)
作者姓名:胡翼青
作者单位:南京大学,新闻传播学院,江苏,南京,210093
摘    要:传播学学科建立之初,选择了以哥伦比亚学派为代表的结构功能主义而不是芝加哥学派的传播研究范式.尽管哥伦比亚学派无论在理论与方法上都不能说更有优势,但其理论成果更容易被意识形态所用,其定量方法更容易为当局的决策提供证据,其研究范式更容易划定传播学科的边界并为该学科带来更多的资源,因此,急于为传播学奠定专业主义边界的施拉姆不假思索地选择了哥伦比亚学派.然而这一选择导致了传播学不但受到意识形态的高度控制,而且也有一套极其保守和封闭的学科规训,这一切使传播学科在20世纪70年代以后就不断受到合法性的质疑.

关 键 词:传播学科  哥伦比亚学派  芝加哥学派

Rise of the Discipline of Communication:-A Period of Re-interpretated History
HU Yi-qing. Rise of the Discipline of Communication:-A Period of Re-interpretated History[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 9(1)
Authors:HU Yi-qing
Affiliation:School of Journalism and Communication;Nanjing University;Nanjing 210093;China
Abstract:When the discipline of communication was established,the structural functionalism,represented by Colombia School,was chosen as the research paradigm instead of that stood for by Chicago School.Despite Colombia School's little advantage on theory and method,its theoretical outcome could be more easily used by ideology,its quantitative method could provide the evidence in an easier way for the authorities to make the decision,and its research paradigm could be used more easily to define the boundary of commun...
Keywords:communication discipline  Colombia School  Chicago School  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号