首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

从“反传统”到“再造文明”——“五四”现代性方案再认识
引用本文:洪峻峰.从“反传统”到“再造文明”——“五四”现代性方案再认识[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,1(3):47-54.
作者姓名:洪峻峰
作者单位:厦门大学学报编辑部,福建,厦门,361005
基金项目:国家社会科学规划基金资助项目(98BDJ008)
摘    要:在当前关于现代性的讨论中,“五四”现代性方案受到多种责难。人们指责“五四”把传统与现代性对立起来,对传统资源完全漠视和否弃。其实,在“五四”前期,新文化人之所以把传统与现代对立起来,正是基于作为现代性前提的“进步”观念。到“五四”后期,新文化人已对现代性方案作出修改。他们改变全面反传统的思路,主张在综合中西文化的基础上“再造文明”,其中包含着对中国传统资源的珍视和肯定;同时实际致力于传统资源的开发和利用,尽力为现代性建构寻求传统的支持。

关 键 词:“五四”  现代性  反传统  再造文明  传统资源
文章编号:0438-0460(2001)03-0047-08
修稿时间:2001年2月27日

From "Anti-Tradition" to "Reconstruction of Civilizat ion": The May 4th Movement's Modernity Programme Revisited
HONG Jun-feng.From "Anti-Tradition" to "Reconstruction of Civilizat ion": The May 4th Movement's Modernity Programme Revisited[J].Journal of Xiamen University(A Quarterly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences),2001,1(3):47-54.
Authors:HONG Jun-feng
Institution:HONG Jun-feng
Abstract:In current discussions of modernity, variou s criticisms are directed a t the modernity programme of the May 4th Movement (M4M). Some criticize M4M for bringing forth a dichotomy between tradition and modernity and completely neglec ting the resources of Chinese traditions. This paper argues that, in the early p eriod of M4M, the New Cultural Pioneers regarded tradition as conflicting with m odernity because they believed that the "progressive" ideas were a prerequisite of modernity. In the later period, however, they revised their programme and pro posed that "reconstruction of civilization" should be based on a combination of western and Chinese cultures as well as a positive attitude towards the resource s of Chinese traditions. Besides, they made every effort to develop and utilize traditional resources thereby providing traditional support for the construction of modernity.
Keywords:The May 4th Movement  modernity  resources of  Chinese traditions  progress
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号