司法参与调解的模式研究

文章通过对正义和司法观念的反思可知,各国司法对调解都有了不同程度的参与,司法对调解的参与模式主要有法院进行调解、法院附设调解、法院指令调解和其他模式(如司法确认、程序监督等)四种模式。与各国制度相比较,我国目前的调解制度一方面将法院调解视为审判权而非诉讼指挥权的组成部分,不利于调解本身的优势发挥;另一方面,没有将司法与调解的衔接制度化、规范化,而是通过法院的试点工作来进行尝试,造成了相当程度的司法资源的浪费。

Study of the Mode of Judicial Intervention in the Mediation

On reflection of the notion of justice,there have been different levels of intervention of mediation in many countries’ judicial system.Judicial intervention in the mediation mainly has four modes including court-performed mediation,court-annexed mediation,mandatory mediation,and the other modes such as judicial confirmation and program monitor.Compared with foreign system,on one hand,the mediation in our country goes against the exploitation of the advantages of mediation as it regards lit-mediation as jurisdiction rather than the power to manage cases.On the other hand,it has not institutionalized the link of justice and mediation,which contributes to the waste of judicial resources.