首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我国风险刑法理论研究中的三大理论误区
引用本文:利子平,石聚航. 我国风险刑法理论研究中的三大理论误区[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 15(4): 112-120
作者姓名:利子平  石聚航
作者单位:南昌大学法学院,南昌,330031;江西警察学院法律学系,南昌,330103
基金项目:国家社会科学基金资助项目“刑法社会化研究”(11BFX109)
摘    要:当前我国风险刑法的理论研究呈现出方兴未艾的繁荣景象,在研究中存在诸多理论误区:一是对风险社会的泛化理解;二是对风险刑法的简单否定;三是对风险刑法的盲目推崇.这些理论误区的存在,一方面使得关于风险社会及风险刑法理论的讨论缺乏共同的平台,无法达成共识;另一方面,由于无视或夸大风险刑法的作用,从而导致风险刑法与传统刑法之间的关系陷入混乱.因此,有必要及时清理风险刑法研究中存在的理论误区,进而合理界定风险社会、风险刑法及其与传统刑法之间的关系.

关 键 词:风险社会  风险刑法  理论误区
收稿时间:2012-06-12

Three Major Theoretical Errors in the Current Risk Criminal Law Research
LI Ziping and SHI Juhang. Three Major Theoretical Errors in the Current Risk Criminal Law Research[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 15(4): 112-120
Authors:LI Ziping and SHI Juhang
Affiliation:1.School of Law, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China2.Department of Law, Jiangxi Police College, Nanchang 330103, China
Abstract:The risk criminal law study shows unfolding prosperity. But at the same time, there exists theoretical errors in the current risk criminal law research: firstly, there is the generalizd understanding of the connotation of risk society; secondly, some scholars negate the function of risk criminal law, and thirdly, some scholars blindly exaggerate the function of risk criminal law. These errors restrict the risk of criminal law theory research and development, which not only makes the risk criminal law lack of common platform, but also leads to the fact that the criminal law can’t answer the challenge of the development of the society. Therefore, it’s necessary to clarify the misunderstandings and accurately locate the role of risk criminal law, thus specifying its relations with risk society and and conventional criminal laws.
Keywords:risk society  risk criminal law  theoretical errors
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号