中国哲学史三种诠释范式论析

20世纪20年代中国哲学史学科逐渐建立以来，学者们先后建构了诠释中国哲学史的三种基本范式。第一种是以赵纪彬、杨荣国等为代表的学者建构的“对子结构”诠释范式。它将中国哲学史诠释为唯物主义与唯心主义、辩证法与形而上学斗争的历史。第二种是以任继愈、肖萐父、李锦全等为代表的学者建构的“板块结构”诠释范式。它将中国哲学史诠释为由本体论、认识论、辩证法、历史观等若干板块构成的体系。第三种是以冯契为代表的学者建构的“螺旋式圆圈结构”诠释范式。它将中国哲学史诠释为基于对历史上不同哲学问题的争论、解答而形成的三大螺旋式圆圈结构。螺旋式圆圈结构范式揭示了中国哲学史展开过程中构成哲学发展环节的范畴、命题、论争，因而成为学术界比较认可的中国哲学史诠释范式。

An Analysis of the Three Interpretation Paradigms of the History of Chinese Philosophy

Since the discipline of the history of Chinese philosophy was gradually established in the 1920s,scholars have constructed three basic paradigms to interpret the history of Chinese philosophy.The first is the interpretation paradigm of "pair structure" constructed by scholars represented by Zhao Jibin and Yang Rongguo.It interprets the history of Chinese philosophy as the history of the struggle between materialism and idealism,dialectics and metaphysics.The second is the interpretation paradigm of "plate structure" constructed by scholars represented by Ren Jiyu,Xiao Jifu and Li Jinquan.It interprets the history of Chinese philosophy as a system composed of ontology,epistemology,dialectics,and view of history and so on.The third isof "spiral circle structure" constructed by scholars represented by Feng Qi,which interprets the history of Chinese philosophy as a three spiral circle structure based on debates and answers to different philosophical problems in history.The spiral circle structure paradigm reveals the categories,propositions and arguments that constitute the development link of philosophy in the process of Chinese philosophy,so it has become a relatively recognized interpretation paradigm in academic circles.