Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy

The stability of a democratic nation has long been thought torest on its level of legitimacy among the mass public. Yet,measurement of such support has been characterized by considerableconfusion. One key element in that confusion is the heavy relianceover the past 20 years on data from a survey item that measuresrespondents' levels of satisfaction with democracy. Data fromthis item have been analyzed in numerous studies of politicalsupport. This research has proceeded despite the existence ofsubstantial disagreement regarding what dimension or dimensionsof support the item measures. In an effort to resolve this ambiguity,we examine the conceptual and empirical properties of the itemin question. The analysis draws on original surveys conductedin 1999 in Romania and El Salvador and on data from the 1997Latinbarometer. Results reveal that the satisfaction with democracyitem taps multiple dimensions of political support and thatthe substantive content represented by the item varies acrossboth individuals and nations. We argue that these empiricalcharacteristics limit the capacity of analysts to derive meaningfulinferences from study of this item and that, until clarificationof the measurement issue is obtained, progress in identifyingpredictors of democratic stability will be slowed.