首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论侵权行为法上的因果关系--兼评因果关系两分法
引用本文:胡吕银.论侵权行为法上的因果关系--兼评因果关系两分法[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,5(5):55-59.
作者姓名:胡吕银
作者单位:扬州大学,政法学院,江苏,扬州,225009
摘    要:两大法系因果关系两分法在内容上存在差异,英美法系因其结构和内容所要求,有其存在的合理性,而大陆法系其存在的意义则不大.因此,不能简单地套搬因果关系的两分法,在我国,侵权行为法上的因果关系就是事实上的因果关系,至于国外因果关系的认定方法则可采用和借鉴.

关 键 词:因果关系  侵权行为法  两分法  事实上因果关系
文章编号:1007-7030(2001)05-0055-05
修稿时间:2000年12月1日

On Causality in Tort Law--Concurrently Discussing "Means of Dvision Into Two" in Causality
HU Lu-yin.On Causality in Tort Law--Concurrently Discussing "Means of Dvision Into Two" in Causality[J].Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2001,5(5):55-59.
Authors:HU Lu-yin
Abstract:The Means of Division Into Two in causality differs in content for the two major law systems. The existence of English-American Law System is reasonable due to its structure and content while there is not much meaning in the existence of Continental Law System. Therefore we must not apply The Means of Division Into Two in causality indiscriminately. In China, causality in Tort Law is causality in actual fact. Foreign means to authenticate causality can be used for reference.
Keywords:causality  Tort Law  Means of Division Into Two  causality in actual fact
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号