| 从出土文献再论荀子“天”论哲学性质 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曾振宇. 从出土文献再论荀子“天”论哲学性质[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2008, 0(4) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曾振宇 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 近代以来,在用西方话语系统建构中国哲学史的过程中,荀子"天"论成为过度诠释的一典型个案。随着近几年考古材料的问世,我们不难发现:荀子"天"论与孔子、孟子"天"论一样,同样蕴涵着"主宰之天"、"自然之天"和"义理之天"等诸种义项,先秦儒家哲学中的"天"并不存在一个由"宗教之天"向"哲学之天"过渡的哲学进程。
|
| 关 键 词： | 荀子 自然之天 主宰之天 义理之天 |
Concerning the Cultural Meaning of XunZi "Tian" thought in new archaeological Finds |
| |
| Zeng Zhen-yu. Concerning the Cultural Meaning of XunZi "Tian" thought in new archaeological Finds[J]. Qilu Journal, 2008, 0(4) |
| |
| Authors: | Zeng Zhen-yu |
| |
| Abstract: | Since modern times,The "Tian" theory of XunZi has become a typical case of over-understanding during the process of building up Chinese philosophy. We find the "Tian" theory of XunZi includes three parts of "Tian of God" , "Tian of Nature" , "Tian of Ethics" just as Confucius and Menxius with the new aechaeological finds. The process is not existed that "Tian" theory transits from "Tian of God" to "Tian of Philosophy" in pre-Chin. |
| |
| Keywords: | XunZi Tian of God Tian of Nature Tian of Ethics |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
