| 马恩的虚幻共同体理论与“三个代表” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李士坤,高振强. 马恩的虚幻共同体理论与“三个代表”[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003, 27(1): 32-37 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李士坤 高振强 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学,哲学系,北京,100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 马克思恩格斯在《德意志意识形态》中认为共同体总是作为独立的东西而与各个个人对立起来 ,不能从根本上普遍地代表每个人的利益和价值追求 ,因而成为虚幻。但是 ,个人只有在虚幻共同体中才能打开通向最终自由解放的道路。研究这个问题对我们认识当前我国政治经济改革中的有关问题和贯彻“三个代表”具有重要指导意义。共产党只有坚持“三个代表”才能扩大群众基础 ,克服虚幻性
|
| 关 键 词： | 虚幻共同体 个人利益 公共利益 三个代表 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5019(2003)01-0032-06 |
Comment on visional community in German ideology and its significance of the time |
| |
| LI Shi-kun GAO Zheng-qiang. Comment on visional community in German ideology and its significance of the time[J]. Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2003, 27(1): 32-37 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Shi-kun GAO Zheng-qiang |
| |
| Affiliation: | LI Shi-kun GAO Zheng-qiang |
| |
| Abstract: | In German Ideology Marx and Engels considered that country was the visional community, and as a absolute thing it always opposed to each individual, so it couldn't represented each individual's behalf and valuable pursue in all, however, only in the visional communities could individuals open up the road to ultimately freedom and liberation. The visional character of a community is related to contented degree to individual behalf and human being's enactment for it. Investigating this question has important meaning to understanding three representatives. |
| |
| Keywords: | visional community individual's behalf three representatives . |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
