共和主义权力逻辑视域下的政治义务

权力逻辑影响着政治义务的证成,不同的权力逻辑下政治义务的证成效果存在显著的差异.依据自由主义的无干涉的权力逻辑,当政治共同体向公民施加某种政治义务时,公民实质上遭到了政治共同体的干涉,而这种干涉行为最终导致政治义务因缺乏正当性而无法得到有效的证成,除非经过公民个人的同意.与之不同,共和主义奉行一种无支配的权力逻辑,它强调当政治共同体向公民施加某种政治义务时,确实对公民造成了干涉,但并没有对公民造成任意的干涉,并且这种干涉根本上切合公民的自身利益.相比较而言,如果依据无支配而非无干涉的权力逻辑来解释政治义务问题,那么公民将更易于自愿承担政治共同体所施加的政治义务.

Political Obligation in the Logical Horizon of Republican Power

The power logic influences the justification of political obligation. There are significant differences in the justifying effects under different power logic. According to the liberal power logic of noninterference,when a political community imposes some kind of political obligation to its citizens,the citizens are essentially interfered by the political community. This kind of interference eventually cause that the political obligation can't be effectively justified because of lack of legitimacy,unless the citizens agree with the political community's interference. In contrast,republicanism pursues a power logic of non-domination. This power logic emphasizes that when a political community imposes some kind of political obligation to its citizens,although it does interfere its citizens,but it does not arbitrarily interfere its citizens,or domination,and such interference basically fits in with its citizens' own interests. Comparatively speaking,if we explain the problem of political obligation according to the power logic of non-domination instead of the power logic of noninterference,the citizens will be more inclined to voluntarily undertake the obligations imposed by their political community.