| 书评中“I”和“we”用法的对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张曼. 书评中“I”和“we”用法的对比研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 27(2): 29-32 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张曼 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中师范大学 外国语学院,武汉,430079 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 华中师范大学2010年“丹桂计划”项目“我国英语学术话语体系的构建”的阶段性成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文以30篇书评为语料,结合定性和定量的方法对比书评中＂I＂和＂we＂体现的作者权力。研究结果表明,书评中的＂I＂多用于发表评价性言论,而＂we＂则多用于对书的客观性介绍,＂I＂比＂we＂体现的作者权力更大。
|
| 关 键 词： | “I” “we” 书评 作者权力 |
Differences in Using I and We in Book Reviews |
| |
| ZHANG Man. Differences in Using I and We in Book Reviews[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 29-32 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Man |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Man(School of Foreign Languages Huazhong Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Using a corpus of 30 English book reviews on linguistics,this paper studies the differences in using I and we in book reviews adopting both qualitative and quantitative methods.The results show that book review writers mostly use I to make evaluative arguments,whereas we is mostly used to objectively introduce the book.In a word,the authorial power realized by I is greater than we. |
| |
| Keywords: | I we book review authorial power |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
