| 两司马治史之比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 俞文冉,陈乃宣. 两司马治史之比较研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(人文科学版), 2001, 54(6): 707-713 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 俞文冉 陈乃宣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学政治与行政学院, |
| |
| 摘 要： | 司马迁和司马光是我国历史上的两位伟大的史学家,他们撰写的<史记>和<资治通鉴>对我国史学产生了深远的影响.他们二人处于不同的历史时代,其著作也有明显的不同.从体例上来讲,<史记>为纪传体,<资治通鉴>为编年体.另外他们二人在历史视野、对待史实的情感、思想倾向以及材料的取舍等方向也有较大的区别.
|
| 关 键 词： | 司马迁 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5374(2001)06-0707-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001-04-18 |
Comparative Research on Historiographies of Two SIMA |
| |
| YU Wen|ran,CHEN Nai|xuan. Comparative Research on Historiographies of Two SIMA[J]. Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences), 2001, 54(6): 707-713 |
| |
| Authors: | YU Wen|ran CHEN Nai|xuan |
| |
| Abstract: | SIMA Qian and SIMA Guang were the great historians of China,their books-- Historical Record and General Appraisements Taking as Management had produced important effects on our historical science.They belong to different era,their books were different too.As for the style,the former was biography,the latter was annalistie.Moreover,they are difference in the vision of historical fielel and the feeling to the historical facts and the accept or reject of historical data and so on. |
| |
| Keywords: | SIMA Qian Historical Records SIMA Quang General Appraisements Taking as Management comparative research |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
