首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

转喻回指照应的认知语用阐释
引用本文:江晓红. 转喻回指照应的认知语用阐释[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 41(4): 71-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2016.04.010
作者姓名:江晓红
作者单位:肇庆学院 外国语学院,广东 肇庆526061
基金项目:广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划项目(GD14CWW04);广东省高等学校高层次人才项目(粤财教[2013]246号);广东省教育厅重大项目(2014WZDXM041)
摘    要:回指在传统上被认为是建立在语言表层上的互指关系,但转喻回指往往涉及一种没有明确先行项的深层回指。深层回指由语用因素控制,且须从认知角度来解释。在认知语用框架下,探讨了转喻回指照应机制,指出转喻回指是在特定语境条件下,以言者表达的意图为主导,听者的认知推理为导向,在寻求转喻回指的关联性解读过程中建立先行词与回指语之间的语义连通。

关 键 词:转喻指称  回指  认知语用  照应机制  
收稿时间:2016-03-10

A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach to Metonymic Anaphor
JIANG Xiao-hong. A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach to Metonymic Anaphor[J]. Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science), 2016, 41(4): 71-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2016.04.010
Authors:JIANG Xiao-hong
Affiliation:School of Foreign Languages, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, 526061, China
Abstract:Anaphora is traditionally taken as co-reference at the linguistic level, but metonymic anaphor, which belongs to deep anaphora with no clear antecedent, is controlled by pragmatic and cognitive factors. With in the framework of cognitive pragmatics, this paper discusses the mechanism of metonymic anaphora, and points out that in a specific context metonymic anaphora is motivated by speaker’s reference and constructed by means of hearer’s inference. It is the attempt to make an utterance relevant that ultimately establishes the conceptual connectivity between antecedent and anaphor.
Keywords:referential metonymy  anaphor  cognitive pragmatics  reference mechanism  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号