| 甲骨文与原始楔形文字新造合体字构字比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 白小丽. 甲骨文与原始楔形文字新造合体字构字比较[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2011, 42(5): 137-142 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 白小丽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东师范大学中国文字研究与应用中心,上海,200241 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家哲学社会科学研究基金项目“汉字与南方民族古文字关系研究”(10BYY049);上海市哲学社会科学重大规划项目“国文字数字化工程--中文信息化补缺建设”(2005DYY001);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“纳西族哥巴文调查研究”(SWU0909679) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 甲骨文和原始楔文都不同程度地反映了早期文字发展的某些特征,二者具有较强的可比性。在造字机制理论基础上,通过比较甲骨文和原始楔文新造合体字构字的组合方式,可以发现二者的共性和个性。原始楔文组合方式除与甲骨文共有的义义组合、义音组合、音音组合外,还有一种特殊的组合。这些组合方式对新造合体字符也会产生一定的影响。
|
| 关 键 词： | 甲骨文 原始楔文 新造合体字 组合方式 比较 |
A Comparison Study on the Compound Ways of New Synthesis Graphs between Inscriptions on Oracle Bones and Proto-cuneiform |
| |
| Bai Xiao-li. A Comparison Study on the Compound Ways of New Synthesis Graphs between Inscriptions on Oracle Bones and Proto-cuneiform[J]. Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2011, 42(5): 137-142 |
| |
| Authors: | Bai Xiao-li |
| |
| Affiliation: | Bai Xiao-li (Center for the Study and Application of Chinese Character, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241) |
| |
| Abstract: | Inscriptions on oracle bones and proto-cuneiform reflect some features of writing’s origin anddevelopment in the early stage. There is an apparent comparability. The article puts emphasis on the study ofcomparison of the compound ways of new synthesis graphs on the basis of character-form mechanism theory, inorder to find their universalities and individualities. Except semantic combination, righteousness soundcombination, and voice combination, proto-cuneiform has a special combination. They will react on the characterform of new synthesis graphs. |
| |
| Keywords: | inscriptions on oracle bones proto-cuneiform new synthesis character combination comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
