| 深港大学教学效果评价比较研究与启示 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵群,葛幸平,曹亦薇. 深港大学教学效果评价比较研究与启示[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2001, 18(1): 116-121 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵群 葛幸平 曹亦薇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 深圳大学师范学院, |
| |
| 基金项目： | 全国教育科学“九五”规划重点课题“面向 21世纪人才培养的高等学校教育评估研究” (99018) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 951名深圳大学生使用SEEQ问卷的中译本对教师进行教学效果评价。其中141名大学生评价“好”与“差”教师的教学，并以此与844名香港大学生的测试结果进行比较。结果表明，SEEQ问卷具有较好的适用性；深港两地学生对有效教学评价标准的认同比较一致，主要体现在教学热情和教学组织，但在学科价值、上课活力与风趣、做笔记与教学水平的关系的认同程度上略有差异。
|
| 关 键 词： | 深港比较研究； SEEQ问卷；教学评价；评价标准 |
| 文章编号： | 1000－ 260X(2001)01－ 0116－ 06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-09-18 |
A Comparative Study of Evaluation of Teaching Outcomes in Shenzhen University and University of Hong Kong and Its Implications |
| |
| ZHAO Qun,GE Xing-ping,CAO Yi wei. A Comparative Study of Evaluation of Teaching Outcomes in Shenzhen University and University of Hong Kong and Its Implications[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University(Humanities & Social Sciences), 2001, 18(1): 116-121 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Qun GE Xing-ping CAO Yi wei |
| |
| Abstract: | 951 Shenzhen University students are asked to use the Chinese version of SEEQ instrument to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of their teachers. Among them, 141 are asked to evaluate the teaching of “ good” and “ bad” teachers. The evaluation result is compared with that of 844 Hong Kong University students. It is found that the SEEQ instrument is good in applicability. Shenzhen students are well identified with Hong Kong students in evaluation standards of effective teaching, concentrating on teaching enthusiasm and teaching organization. However, When it comes to the relationship between subject values, class dynamics and humor, note taking and teaching standards, there are slight differences among the students of the two regions. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
