首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

自由心证的"自由"与"不自由"——民事诉讼自由心证原则解读
引用本文:宋琛,孙庆童. 自由心证的"自由"与"不自由"——民事诉讼自由心证原则解读[J]. 北京化工大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 0(3): 38-41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6639.2010.03.008
作者姓名:宋琛  孙庆童
作者单位:中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京,100088;中国国际航空股份有限公司地面服务部,北京,101312
摘    要:自由心证原则是当今世界各国普遍采纳的证据规则,本文在对自由心证原则进行基本概念分析的基础上,讨论了法官自由心证的范围以及在心证客观化趋势下对自由心证的种种限制,并对在我国民事诉讼领域确立自由心证制度进行了分析。

关 键 词:自由心证  范围  客观化

Doctrine on the Discretional Evaluation of Evidence between Freedom and the Regulations
Song Chen,Sun Qingtong. Doctrine on the Discretional Evaluation of Evidence between Freedom and the Regulations[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Science Edition), 2010, 0(3): 38-41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6639.2010.03.008
Authors:Song Chen  Sun Qingtong
Affiliation:Song Chen Sun Qingtong(School of Civil Commercial , Economic laws China University of Political Science , Law,Beijing 100088,Air China Limited,Beijing 101312,China)
Abstract:Doctrine on the discretional evaluation of evidence is commonly adopted by the rules of evidence.On the basis of the basic conceptual analysis and discussion on the discretional evaluation of evidence,the authors clarify the objective trend of evidence of the restrictions,and analyze the establishment of the discretional evaluation of evidence in civil procedure.
Keywords:doctrine of the discretional evaluation of evidence  range  intimate conviction  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号