首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Validity of the microsoft kinect system in assessment of compensatory stepping behavior during standing and treadmill walking
Authors:Guy Shani  Amir Shapiro  Goldstein Oded  Kagan Dima  Itshak Melzer
Institution:1.Department of Software and Information Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Sciences,Ben-Gurion University,Beer-Sheva,Israel;2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Sciences,Ben-Gurion University,Beer-Sheva,Israel;3.Schwartz Movement Analysis & Rehabilitation Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department,Recanati School for Community Health Professions, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev,Beer-Sheva,Israel
Abstract:

Background

Rapid compensatory stepping plays an important role in preventing falls when balance is lost; however, these responses cannot be accurately quantified in the clinic. The Microsoft Kinect? system provides real-time anatomical landmark position data in three dimensions (3D), which may bridge this gap.

Methods

Compensatory stepping reactions were evoked in 8 young adults by a sudden platform horizontal motion on which the subject stood or walked on a treadmill. The movements were recorded with both a 3D-APAS motion capture and Microsoft Kinect? systems. The outcome measures consisted of compensatory step times (milliseconds) and length (centimeters). The average values of two standing and walking trials for Microsoft Kinect? and the 3D-APAS systems were compared using t-test, Pearson’s correlation, Altman-bland plots, and the average difference of root mean square error (RMSE) of joint position.

Results

The Microsoft Kinect? had high correlations for the compensatory step times (r?=?0.75–0.78, p?=?0.04) during standing and moderate correlations for walking (r?=?0.53–0.63, p?=?0.05). The step length, however had a very high correlations for both standing and walking (r?>?0.97, p?=?0.01). The RMSE showed acceptable differences during the perturbation trials with smallest relative error in anterior-posterior direction (2-3%) and the highest in the vertical direction (11–13%). No systematic bias were evident in the Bland and Altman graphs.

Conclusions

The Microsoft Kinect? system provides comparable data to a video-based 3D motion analysis system when assessing step length and less accurate but still clinically acceptable for step times during balance recovery when balance is lost and fall is initiated.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号