| 1940-1970年代中国主流批评家批评心态解析——以周扬、茅盾、姚文元为个案 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄擎.1940-1970年代中国主流批评家批评心态解析——以周扬、茅盾、姚文元为个案[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,13(6):87-92,128. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄擎 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学人文学院,浙江 杭州,310028 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 浙江省社科规划青年项目“‘红色批评’话语研究”(07CGZW005YBQ)成果之一 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作为1940-1970年代主流批评家的代表,周扬、茅盾和姚文元都具有政府高官兼批评家的特殊身份,自觉顺应主流意识形态的吁求,但三人的话语表现和批评心态又有所不同:作为毛泽东文艺思想的权威阐释者,周扬的批评话语和心路历程体现了以政策阐释为文艺批评生命线的被动与尴尬;茅盾的批评心态略显自由,存在较为明显的现实取向与开放心态之间的矛盾;姚文元的批评话语是典型的大批判话语,体现了斫伤文学批评本性的畸形批评心态。
|
| 关 键 词： | 1940-70年代 批评心态 周扬 茅盾 姚文元 |
An analysis of the mentality of the mainstream critics during the 1940s-1970s |
| |
| HUANG Qing.An analysis of the mentality of the mainstream critics during the 1940s-1970s[J].Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science ),2011,13(6):87-92,128. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Qing |
| |
| Abstract: | Zhou Yang,Mao Dun and Yao Wenyuan as the mainstream critics during the 1940s-1970s were high-ranking officials.They were prepared to answer the calls of the mainstream ideology;nonetheless,their discourse styles and mentalities were divided.Zhou Yan as the authoritative interpreter of Mao's thoughts on art and literature underwent the passiveness of taking the official policy as the lifeline for the literary criticism;Mao Dun had relatively more freedom though he was in a dilemma of choosing between the ori... |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
