| “蚤”是本有其字的假借吗 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙绪武. “蚤”是本有其字的假借吗[J]. 汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2006, 22(1): 27-29 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙绪武 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东技术师范学院中文系,广东,广州,510665 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 传统的观点认为,“蚤”是本有其字的假借,它的本字“早”产生于“蚤”之前。近十几年提出的观点认为,“早”产生于“蚤”之后,“蚤”是本无其字的假借。作者经过研究认为,“蚤”仅仅是个有本字的假借字,至于它的本字产生先后并不能确切地断定。
|
| 关 键 词： | 本字 假借字 早 蚤 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-4225(2006)01-0027-003 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-05-08 |
Is Zao(蚤) Substitute for an Original Character? |
| |
| SUN Xu-wu. Is Zao(蚤) Substitute for an Original Character?[J]. Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition), 2006, 22(1): 27-29 |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Xu-wu |
| |
| Abstract: | The traditional view holds that Zao(蚤)is a substitute for an original character Zao(早).The view in the past ten years is that Zao(早) developed after Zao(蚤).The authorbelieves that the former holds true,but it is not certain when the original character came into being. |
| |
| Keywords: | original character substitute Zao(早) Zao(蚤) |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
