| 经验演进还是理性建构--关于中国法律传统与法治道路的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何肖琬. 经验演进还是理性建构--关于中国法律传统与法治道路的思考[J]. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2001, 14(4): 392-397 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何肖琬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学 法学院,山东 济南 250100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 世界各国的法律发展过程,大致可分为"经验演进式”和"理性建构式”两种发展模式.中国传统法律思想的缺陷以及中国法治建设的后发性决定了中国不宜走"经验演进式”道路,而应走一条渐进的、按阶段进行的"理性建构式”道路.
|
| 关 键 词： | 经验演进式 理性建构式 本土资源 中国传统法律思想 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3194(2001)04-0392-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-11-28 |
Historical Evolvement or Reason Constitution--Reflections on the Tradition of Chinese Law and Legal Development |
| |
| HE Xiao-wan. Historical Evolvement or Reason Constitution--Reflections on the Tradition of Chinese Law and Legal Development[J]. Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2001, 14(4): 392-397 |
| |
| Authors: | HE Xiao-wan |
| |
| Abstract: | The development of law in various countries can be generally classified into two patterns: historical evolvement and reason constitution. Because of the weaknesses of the traditional legal conceptions and th e late development of China's construction,China should not follow the way of h istorical evolvement, but follow a gradual and phasal way of reason constitution . |
| |
| Keywords: | historical evolvement pattern reason constitution pattern national resources Chinese traditional legal thoughts |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
