| 艺术评论即“补救” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵树军. 艺术评论即“补救”[J]. 江汉大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 30(4): 66-71 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵树军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 云南民族大学 职业技术学院,云南 昆明,650031 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对于艺术评论,理查德·沃尔海姆提出了评论即"补救"的观点,也即恢复作品原状的观点。与文学评论的概念相比,这一观点具有更广泛的适应性。沃尔海姆主要从反正两个方面对该论点进行了论证,提出了"修正"、"细查"等观点。此外,他提出了认知储存的概念,并对其进行了分类。他还对创作过程和艺术家的意图进行了区分。
|
| 关 键 词： | 理查德·沃尔海姆 “补救” “修正” “细查” “认知储存” |
Art Criticism is "Remedial" |
| |
| ZHAO Shu-jun. Art Criticism is "Remedial"[J]. Journal of JIanghan University:Social Sciences, 2013, 30(4): 66-71 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Shu-jun |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHAO Shu-jun;School of Vocational and Technical Education,Yunnan University of Nationalities; |
| |
| Abstract: | For the art criticism, Richard Wollheim has raised the viewpoint that criticism is ＂remedi- al＂, i. e. the viewpoint of restoring the original state of the work. Compared with idea of the literature crit- icism, the viewpoint is more adaptable. He mainly proved his viewpoint from both positive and negative aspects by putting forwards viewpoints as ＂revision＂, ＂scrutiny＂. In addition, he has raised the idea a- bout cognitive reserve and made an analysis. He has made distinction between creative process and art- ists＇ intentions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Richard Wollheim ＂remedy＂ ＂revision scrutiny＂ cognitive reserve |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
