| 尼采与儒家哲学生命超越论之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗秋立.尼采与儒家哲学生命超越论之比较[J].云南社会科学,2005,4(5):40-43. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗秋立 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 韩山师范学院,政史系,广东,潮洲,521041 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 生命自我超越是中西哲学的一大主题。西方近代哲学对主体性和超越性的建构使人类自我超越的归宿漂离宗教,尼采超人哲学力图使人类价值理想从天国的彼岸回到人间,克服了近代哲学生命终极关怀的超绝性和神秘性,从而与中国儒家哲学通过伦理方式沟通人的理想境界与现实世界层面来实现道德的真我有异曲同工之处。但是,尼采和儒家哲学的先验唯心主义立场和专制等级主义情结,使其生命超越论陷入空洞并不失反动之嫌。马克思所阐明的在“自由联合体”中的“自由而全面的人”真正地实现了生命的超越,达到了真正的善、生命的终极价值,从而形成了对“超人”价值论和“圣人”境界论的批判。
|
| 关 键 词： | 尼采 儒家哲学 自我超越 自由联合体 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-8691(2005)05-0040-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年4月29日 |
A Comparison between the Life Transcendence Theories in Nietzsche's Philosophy and Confucian Philosophy |
| |
| LUO Qiu-li.A Comparison between the Life Transcendence Theories in Nietzsche''''s Philosophy and Confucian Philosophy[J].Social Sciences in Yunnan,2005,4(5):40-43. |
| |
| Authors: | LUO Qiu-li |
| |
| Abstract: | Life transcendence is a m ain topic in Confucianism and w estern philosophy.The construction ofsubjectivityand transcendence in modern western philosophy enables man's life transcendence to step out of religion. Nietzsche refutedthe transcendence and secrecy of life's ultimate concern discussed in modern philosophy and insisted that man's ultimate valueshould be realized in reality. For this reason,there are some analogies between Nietzsche's philosophy and Confucianismwhich emphasizes moral idea realization can be attained by intercoursing our idea and real world. However,Nietzsche'sphilosophy and Confucianism have some defects in their philosophy stand. The ultimate value of life can be interpreted byMarx,whose theory of "liberal community" finds its critique to Nietzsche's philosophy and Confucianism's lifetranscendence. |
| |
| Keywords: | Nietzsche Confucianism Self transcendence Liberal community |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
