首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

食品监管渎职罪司法认定的困境及优化路径
引用本文:刘睿.食品监管渎职罪司法认定的困境及优化路径[J].盐城工学院学报(社会科学版),2020,33(1):25-29.
作者姓名:刘睿
作者单位:安徽大学 法学院, 安徽 合肥 230601
摘    要:自《刑法修正案(八)》增设食品监管渎职罪以来,其适用率呈偏低的趋势,与我国食品安全犯罪频发的现状不相符合。究其原因,该罪在责任主体认定、因果关系判定,以及危害后果界定三个方面存在难以厘清的困境。而学界虽在不断探讨该罪名的适用标准,但大多局限于理论建构层面,而忽略了司法适用的有效性。故从实证分析视角,明晰该罪的司法认定标准,以期对我国的司法实践有所贡献。

关 键 词:食品监管渎职罪  责任主体认定  因果关系判定  危害后果界定
收稿时间:2019/9/3 0:00:00

Difficulties in Judicial Recognition of Food Regulation Malfeasance and Optimizing Path
LIU Rui.Difficulties in Judicial Recognition of Food Regulation Malfeasance and Optimizing Path[J].Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology,2020,33(1):25-29.
Authors:LIU Rui
Institution:Law School, Anhui University, Hefei Anhui230601, China
Abstract:Since the Criminal Law Amendment(8)added the crime of dereliction of duty in food supervision, the trend of low applicability does not accord with the current situation of frequent food safety crimes in China. The reasons are as follows, It is difficult to clarify the predicament of the crime in three aspects: the identification of the subject of responsibility, the determination of causality and the definition of harmful consequences. And the academic circles are also constantly exploring the applicable standard of this crime, but many of them are confined to the level of theoretical construction, the validity of judicial application is neglected. Therefore, this paper intends to analyze from the perspective of empirical analysis, clarifying the Judicial Recognition Criteria of the Crime, with a view to benefiting our judicial practice.
Keywords::dereliction of duty in food supervision  identification of the subject of responsibility  causality determination definition of hazardous consequences
点击此处可从《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号