| ADR的法律探析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 岑雅衍,金一波.ADR的法律探析[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),1995(3). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 岑雅衍 金一波 |
| |
| 摘 要： | ＡＤＲ即ＡｌｔｅｒｎａｔｉｖｅＤｉｓｐｕｔｅＲｅｓｏｌｕｔｉｏｎｓ，因其简便、快捷、花费少、专业性及保密性强等明显优于诉讼的特点，于本世纪六十年代在美国应运而生，并在实践中日趋规范化、法制化、合理化，显示出其非凡的活力，成为其存在的基础和发展的动力．但作为近几年刚发展起来的新事物，其实践一直走在理论的前面，ＡＤＲ理论的探讨迄今为止仍停留在一个相当表面的阶段上，存在很多尚未解决的问题，在实际操作中亦有不完善的地方．ＡＤＲ的体制尚需不断改进和完善。
|
| 关 键 词： | ADR，法律探析 |
A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ADR |
| |
| Cen Yayan Jin Yibo.A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ADR[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Liberal Arts Edition),1995(3). |
| |
| Authors: | Cen Yayan Jin Yibo |
| |
| Institution: | Cen Yayan Jin Yibo |
| |
| Abstract: | ADR(Altemative Dispute Resolution) is apparently superior to lawsuit for its convenience,quickness, enconomy,and high specialization and strict confidentiality. ADR came into being first in America in 1960s and has become more and mere standardized,and rationalized in prectice,demonstrating its extraordinary vitality which it is based onand developed with. However,the newly-developed ADR is not so much theoretically examined as it is practically used,with only a supperlicial study for the former. ADR, practised so far somuch,has still a lot of problems unsolved and has big room for improvement. |
| |
| Keywords: | ADR legal analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
