目的解释之再提倡——基于刑事诉讼法目的与刑法目的之比较

鉴于刑事诉讼中控辩双方力量上的悬殊以及进入刑事诉讼中的被告人事实上可能无罪，因此刑事诉讼法目的主要在于保障人权，而非打击犯罪。疑罪从无与有利于被告应只适用于对证据与事实存有疑问时，而不应成为刑法解释的方向。刑法条文是正义的文字表述，亦是刑法解释的对象。“目的是全部法律的创造者”，因此刑法解释应以刑法条文背后的法益保护目的为解释目标。当对刑法解释存有疑问时，应在罪刑法定主义原则的框架内，根据刑法条文背后的目的，尽可能实现规范内的处罚正义。

Re-advocating of Teleological Method of Interpretation --A Comparative Analysis of the Purposes of Criminal Procedure Law and Criminal Law

Given the great disparity of the power between the accuser and the defender in criminal suits and the pos- sibility that the defendant may not be guilty in criminal proceedings, the Criminal Procedure Law mainly aims to en- sure human rights instead of impose punishment for crimes. The principles of ＂presumption of innocence＂ and ＂in dubio pro reo＂ should only apply to the occasions when evidences and facts are questioned, rather than becoming the direction of interpretation of criminal law. Clauses of criminal law are not only the right verbal expressions, but the objects of interpretation of criminal law. ＂The aim creates all the laws. ＂ Thus, interpretation of criminal law should aim at protecting legal interest behind the clauses of criminal law. If there exists doubt on the interpretation of criminal law, it should enact within the framework of the principles of legality and on the basis of the aims behind the clauses of criminal law, thus to achieve the justice of punishment within the specification as much as possible.