首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

行政公益诉讼管辖模式选择
引用本文:唐小娟. 行政公益诉讼管辖模式选择[J]. 盐城工学院学报(社会科学版), 2008, 21(3): 19-21
作者姓名:唐小娟
作者单位:苏州大学,法学院,江苏,苏州,215006
摘    要:在建立行政公益诉讼已经达成共识的情形下,管辖问题的改革不仅要考虑保护相对人私人利益,同时也要注意保障公共利益。对三种管辖模式利弊分析后,“对于涉及私人利益的行政案件施行异地管辖,涉及公共利益的行政案件施行提级管辖”的思路,更能通过程序公正来保障实体公正,从制度层面切断或阻隔行政等外部力量对司法的不当干预,实现行政权和司法权的良性互动。

关 键 词:行政公益诉讼  异地管辖  提级管辖

Jurisdiction Mode of Administrative Public Interest Litigation Cases
TANG Xiao-juan. Jurisdiction Mode of Administrative Public Interest Litigation Cases[J]. Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology, 2008, 21(3): 19-21
Authors:TANG Xiao-juan
Affiliation:TANG Xiao-juan (Law School,Suzhou University,Jiangsu Suzhou 215006,China)
Abstract:Several rules about jurisdiction of administrative cases which are implemented since February 2008, clearly passed three modes , highlevel jurisdiction, different district trial and designated jurisdiction. Nowadays the establishment of the public interest litigation has reached consensus, so the reform of jurisdiction should consider safeguarding both of private and public interest. After comprehensively analyzing the modes, methods that different case apply different jurisdiction mode are better to protect entities fair by due process. This system effectively blocks external power to interfere with justice, so that achieve the executive and the judicial power benign interaction.
Keywords:administrative public interest litigation  different district jurisdiction  high - level jurisdiction
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号