民事证明责任概念再探究--兼论我国证明责任概念的科学定位

对证明责任概念的准确把握和定位是深入研究证明责任理论的前提,但目前学界对证明责任概念和构成的理解存在一定偏颇。大陆法系和英美法系中有关证明责任概念占主流地位的学术观点是“双重含义说”,行为责任说、双重含义说、危险负担说是我国证明责任概念的3种主流学说。从客观角度讲,我国证明责任概念应坚持“提供证据责任与证明责任（结果意义上的）相区别的双重含义说”,证明责任应包括行为责任和结果责任两个方面。

On the Concept of Burden of Proof in Civil Action and Its Scientific Orientation in China

It is the precondition of in-depth research on the theory of burden of proof to exactly grasp and define the concept“burden of proof”.However,at present the academic-circles’comprehension of the concept is improper.The leading theory about the concept in common law and in continent law is “the doctrine of twofold meanings”.At the same time,there are three theories about the concept in china,namely,burden of action theory,twofold meanings theory and risk bearing theory.In actual point,the concept of burden of proof in our country should keep “twofold meanings theory”,and burden of proof should have two aspects:burden of action and burden of result.