首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《中国新文学大系》的“新文学”本位观质疑——以学衡派的定位为例
引用本文:邱焕星.《中国新文学大系》的“新文学”本位观质疑——以学衡派的定位为例[J].东方论坛,2009(1):38-41.
作者姓名:邱焕星
作者单位:南京大学,中国现代文学研究中心,江苏,南京,210093
摘    要:为了在1930年代证明五四“新文学”的合法性,《中国新文学大系(1917—1927)》在编纂《文学论争集》时,通过否定“旧文学”来强化其“新文学”立场,但将学衡派这样的现代性矛盾统一体贬为“复古派”,暴露了这种二元对立模式的排他性和策略性,《大系》也因此割裂了自己和传统的联系,窄化了“现代文学”观念,这种遮蔽和重构对“中国现代文学”的学科建设产生了重大影响。

关 键 词:《中国新文学大系》  学衡派  新文学  二元对立

Questioning the "New Literature" Orientation of The Collection of Chinese New-Vernacular Literature Works
QIU Huan-xing.Questioning the "New Literature" Orientation of The Collection of Chinese New-Vernacular Literature Works[J].Orient Forum,2009(1):38-41.
Authors:QIU Huan-xing
Institution:Research Center for Modern Chinese Literature;Nanjing University;Nanjing 210093;China
Abstract:The Collection of Chinese New-Vernacular Literature Works played a decisive role in establishing the lawfulness of the "new literature" during the May 4th Movement. For this purpose, it conf irmed the status of new literature school, and negated the old literary schools. But it confused the substance of many schools, such as "Xueheng School" as a mixture of modernity and contradiction. It declared it had broken away with the connection with Chinese literary traditions, narrowed the concept of the "modern Ch...
Keywords:The Collection of Chinese New-Vernacular Literature Works  Xueheng School  new Chinese literature  binary opposition  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号