首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论“侵害(trespass)”令状所体现的严格责任思想
引用本文:周中举,.论“侵害(trespass)”令状所体现的严格责任思想[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2011,28(5):75-83.
作者姓名:周中举  
作者单位:四川省社会科学院法学研究所,成都,610072
摘    要:英美法上的"侵害"令状(trespass)经历了久远的发展历程。"侵害"令状不考虑加害人过错,实质因其具有绝对责任性质,根本无需考虑过错;美国法上现代意义的严格责任往往与过错有关,其"不考虑过错"是相对的,不是绝对的。因此,早期英美侵权法"令状"制度不能等同于现代意义的严格责任。但从法的历史继承看,其不考虑过错而责令被告承担责任的归责形式与严格责任具有相似性,具备了严格责任的雏形,为严格责任的发展提供了基础。

关 键 词:侵权法  “侵害(trespass)”令状  严格责任  英美法系

On Strict Responsibility Ideas Embodied by Trespass
ZHOU Zhong-ju.On Strict Responsibility Ideas Embodied by Trespass[J].Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University Social Science Edition,2011,28(5):75-83.
Authors:ZHOU Zhong-ju
Institution:ZHOU Zhong-ju(Law Institute,Sichuan Academy of Social Science,Chengdu 610072,China)
Abstract:The trespass in the law of the United Kingdom and the United States underwent a long development process.The trespass does not consider the fault of an inflictor(the party causing injury),and its essence is that the inflictor takes absolute responsibility and is not needed to consider his fault.In modern meaning of the law of the United States,strict responsibility is always related to the fault,that the fault is not considered is relative but is not absolute.Thus,the early trespass system of the United Kin...
Keywords:infringing law  trespass  strict responsibility  the law system of the United Kingdom and the United States  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号