Supporting the sustainability of Mad Studies and preventing its co-option |
| |
Authors: | Peter Beresford Jasna Russo |
| |
Institution: | College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Mad Studies is emerging as a new force in ‘mental health’ discourse and developments. Given the way in which other would-be progressive developments associated with attempts to include experimental knowledge in this field, such as ‘recovery’ and ‘peer support’, have been subverted, this article considers whether it is possible for Mad Studies to avoid this. Drawing on developments in Disability Studies and in relation to the social model of disability, we explore what can be done in order to safeguard the distinctiveness of Mad Studies and foster its unique contribution. |
| |
Keywords: | Mad Studies co-option Disability Studies sustainability the social model of disability |
|
|