首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Using a systems orientation and foundational theory to enhance theory-driven human service program evaluations
Authors:Deborah L Wasserman
Institution:1. Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada;2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada;3. Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland;2. Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland;3. Center for Pharmacogenomics and Translational Research, Nemours Children''s Health System, Jacksonville, Florida;4. Biomedical Research Unit, AB PRISMA, Lima, Peru;1. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, PR China;2. Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Nanjing 210001, PR China;1. Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226;2. Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
Abstract:This paper offers a framework for using a systems orientation and “foundational theory” to enhance theory-driven evaluations and logic models. The framework guides the process of identifying and explaining operative relationships and perspectives within human service program systems. Self-Determination Theory exemplifies how a foundational theory can be used to support the framework in a wide range of program evaluations. Two examples illustrate how applications of the framework have improved the evaluators’ abilities to observe and explain program effect. In both exemplars improvements involved addressing and organizing into a single logic model heretofore seemingly disparate evaluation issues regarding valuing (by whose values); the role of organizational and program context; and evaluation anxiety and utilization.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号