英汉语言学学术语篇言据性对比研究

以语言学领域核心期刊《当代语言学》和 Journal ofPragmatics中选取的文章为语料建立相应的英汉语料库。依据胡壮麟提出的可证性理论修正模式，就据素频率及种类分布，对英汉语言学学术语篇中的可证性特点进行了探讨。研究发现：（1）在英汉语言学学术语篇中，言据性存在显著性差异；（2）不同的语用策略使得两种语言在言据性特征上存在明显差异。在英语语言中，作者更倾向于直接选取语用策略和条件假设策略，而汉语语言作者更多地选取间接语用策略；（3）英汉语言学学术语篇中据素使用存在相似性，即传闻、演绎和归纳据素使用比例较高，而预期、信度和信念据素使用偏低；（4）言据性与学术语篇特点密切相关。

Comparative Study of Evidentiality in Chinese and English Linguistic Academic Discourses

The paper makes comparative study on evidentiality in Chinese and English linguistic academic discourses on the basis of Hu’s Model of Evidentilaity.The corpora include selected theses from core journals,Contemporary Linguis-tics and Generals ofPragmatics,in the field of linguistics.The findings are:(1 )Evidentiality varies significantly in Chi-nese and English linguistic academic discourses;(2)Different pragmatic strategies lead to significant differences in evi-dentiality.In English,the authors tend to direct pragmatic strategy and conditional assumption strategy,while Chinese authors incline indirect pragmatic strategy;(3)There exist evidential similarities in Chinese and English linguistic aca-demic discourses,that is,hearsay,induction,deduction evidentials show high distribution frequency but that of belief, expectation,evidentials are low in both languages;(4)Evidentiality do have relationship with academic discourses.