首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论伯纳德·威廉斯的功利主义批判
引用本文:潘红霞.论伯纳德·威廉斯的功利主义批判[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2012,26(3):101-105.
作者姓名:潘红霞
作者单位:华中科技大学哲学系,湖北武汉,430071
摘    要:伯纳德.威廉斯在对功利主义后果论的结构分析中指出其责任原则的显著缺陷是冷漠与消极,对效用最大化的追求导致功利主义把价值赋予事态而忽视个人分离性,而过度的道德义务要求使个体与自身道德情感及行为相异化,破坏了行动者的道德完整性。虽然威廉斯的功利主义批判饱受质疑,但他对人性、品质的重视与对个人生活意义的关切,切中了功利主义的要害,敞开了走出现代道德哲学困境的新路径。

关 键 词:后果主义  功利主义  个人分离性  完整性

On Bernard Williams' Critique of Utilitarianism
PAN Hong xia.On Bernard Williams' Critique of Utilitarianism[J].Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences),2012,26(3):101-105.
Authors:PAN Hong xia
Institution:PAN Hong-xia(Department of Philosophy,HU ST,Wuhan 430071,China)
Abstract:Bernard Williams stands on the position of the agent criticize utilitarianism.In the analysis of the consequentialist structure of utilitarianism,he points out the significant defects of its responsibility principles are indifference and negative.The pursuit of maximize benefits leads to utilitarianism giving value to state of affairs,ignoring the personal separateness.And the too much demanding makes individuals alienate from their moral feelings and behaviors,therefore destructs the agent’s moral integrity.The responses of many scholars are neither a threat to William’s critique nor a defense of utilitarianism.William’s criticism reflects his concern about human nature,personal characters and the meaning of life;which makes up the shortage of modern moral philosophy theories.
Keywords:consequentialism  utilitarianism  personal separability  integrity
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号