首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中美合同法对要约和承诺规定的比较研究
引用本文:廖学全.中美合同法对要约和承诺规定的比较研究[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,17(2):57-63.
作者姓名:廖学全
作者单位:汕头大学文学院,广东,汕头,515063
摘    要:本文对《中华人民共和国合同法》、美国《统一商法典》和普通法有关合同成立要件中的要约和承诺的相关规定作了对比研究,进而指出:我国合同法对要约和承诺的规定虽然借鉴了市场经济发达国家和地区的立法经验和判例学说,但要让其科学地规范我国市场经济建设中大量的经济行为并同国际惯例接轨,仍亟需改进和完善。

关 键 词:合同法  要约  承诺  比较研究
文章编号:1001-4225(2001)02-0057-07
修稿时间:2000年6月13日

A comparative study of the differences in offer and acceptance between China's and US contract laws
LIAO Xuequan.A comparative study of the differences in offer and acceptance between China''''s and US contract laws[J].Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition),2001,17(2):57-63.
Authors:LIAO Xuequan
Abstract:Offer and acceptance are among the many essentials of a valid contract. In this paper the relevant legal provisions for these two essentials in the Contract law of the Republic of People's China are compared with those in the Uniform Commercial Code of the United States and other common laws, and results Obtained are evaluated. It is pointed out that although China had consulted the legislative thinking and case study from countries and regions with developed marked econnomy before stipulating relevant provisions for the two in China's Contract Law, there still exists a gap for China to bridge while standardizing scientifically the many economic behaviors occurring in domestic market economy and coming up to the same par with international practice.
Keywords:contract law  offer  acceptance  comparative study  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号