| 在事实性与有效性之间——论哈贝马斯对新分析法学和新自然法学思想的超越 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曾彩琳.在事实性与有效性之间——论哈贝马斯对新分析法学和新自然法学思想的超越[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011,27(4):15-18,94. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曾彩琳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]重庆大学,重庆400030;[2]山东师范大学,山东济南250014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在哈贝马斯看来,法律是事实性与有效性的统一,其对二者关系的分析对于重新审视新分析法学与新自然法学的分歧提供了新的理论视角。新分析法学仅专注于法律事实性,而新自然法学则过于强调法律有效性,因而使各自理论在一定程度上陷于困境。哈贝马斯以交往行动理论为基础的程序主义法律观试图弥合以往法学理论对法律的事实性与有效性的分裂,是对新分析法学和新自然法学思想的超越。
|
| 关 键 词： | 事实性 有效性 新分析法学 新自然法学 程序主义法律观 |
Between Factuality and Validity——On How Habermas Transcends the New Analytical Jurisprudence and the New Natural Law |
| |
| ZENG Cai-lin.Between Factuality and Validity——On How Habermas Transcends the New Analytical Jurisprudence and the New Natural Law[J].Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition),2011,27(4):15-18,94. |
| |
| Authors: | ZENG Cai-lin |
| |
| Institution: | ZENG Cai-lin(1.Chongqing University,Chongqing 400030,2.Shandong Normal University,Jinan,Shandong 250014) |
| |
| Abstract: | Habermas's view that law is a unification of factuality and validity as well as his analysis of their relationship provides a new approach to a re-examination of the division of the New Analytical Jurisprudence and the New Natural Law.The New Analytical Jurisprudence focuses its attention on legal factuality only while the New Natural Law overemphasizes the legal validity,hence the dilemma of the two theories to some extent.Habermas's legal view of proceduralism,which is based on communication action theory... |
| |
| Keywords: | factuality validity New Analytical Jurisprudence New Natural Law a legal view of proceduralism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
