| 再谈物权行为 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨秋生.再谈物权行为[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(5):458-460. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨秋生 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 辽宁工程技术大学,政法系,辽宁,阜新,123000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国民法典的编纂是否应引入物权行为制度是现今法律界讨论的一个重点问题。从民法典体例的选择与物权制度的关系入手,提出中国民法典应采用德国体例,选择德国体例就应引入物权行为制度。这是德国民法的体系性、逻辑性和科学性所决定的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 民法典 体例 物权行为 物权 债权 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-391X(2004)05-0458-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年9月26日 |
Re-discussion about the juristic act of right in rem |
| |
| YANG Qiu-sheng.Re-discussion about the juristic act of right in rem[J].Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Social Science Edition),2004,6(5):458-460. |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Qiu-sheng |
| |
| Abstract: | Whether the regulation of juristic act of right in rem should be adopted in the compilation of civil code in China is an important problem in modern law circles.Starting with the relationship between the choice of civil code pattern and the regulation of juristic act of right in rem,the author puts forward a point of view in this paper that German legal pattern should be adopted in Chinese civil code and the regulation of juristic act of right in rem should be adopted if German legal pattern was adopted.This is decided by the systematic,logic and scientific character of German civil law. |
| |
| Keywords: | civil code pattern juristic act of right in rem real right credit |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
