Unobtrusively Stretching Law: Legal Education,Activism, and Reclaiming Title IX |
| |
Authors: | Barret Katuna Elizabeth Holzer |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Sociology, University of Connecticut – Unit 1068, Storrs, CT, USA;2. Human Rights Institute, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA |
| |
Abstract: | We often understate the work that activists put into crafting movement tools. This article examines the space between legal texts and movement resources in a study of early activism surrounding Title IX. Though often hailed as a feminist law, the Title IX statute and regulations lay out a narrow set of individual rights and incorporate several conservative principles. In an analysis of early social movement mobilization surrounding Title IX by the Connecticut Women's Educational and Legal Fund (CWEALF), we identify a distinctive legal framing technique tied to the often overlooked practice of lay legal education. In a legal education campaign that targeted schools, CWEALF placed Title IX's actual requirements alongside broader feminist ideas about gender socialization and civic responsibility to imply that the law mandated substantially greater reforms, a tactic we call unobtrusively stretching law. This article contributes to research on social movements and legal mobilization by illustrating how legal education can serve as part of the tool-making kit for social movements as they struggle to transform legislative compromises into movement resources. |
| |
Keywords: | Legal education feminist law framing legal mobilization legal interpretation gender socialization public policy |
|
|