中国《信托法》逻辑自洽性的不足与修正

中国《信托法》制定时，国内法学界对信托制度的研究总体上比较薄弱，缺乏对信托制度的本土化及信托法系统性构建的深入思考，导致《信托法》存在许多问题，除了目前已被法学界关注的一些制度设计上的不合理或不妥当之外，还存在一个为当前学界忽略但又颇为突出的问题，即《信托法》自身的逻辑自洽性不足问题，主要体现在《信托法》内部存在彼此冲突、前后矛盾或规则之间不统一的现象。逻辑自洽性是衡量一部法律是否完善的基本标尺，欠缺逻辑自洽性的法律会影响其自身的科学性，还会影响其对社会生活的有序及有效调整。

The Shortage and Modification of Logic Consistency in China Trust Law

China Trust Law has been developed for more than ten years. At the time of enacting the law, the overall research on the trust system is relatively insufficient in the law circles of our country, and lacks in-depth reflection on the localization and systematic construction of trust system. Because of this insufficiency of the theoretical study in our country, there are many problems in China Trust Law. In addition to some problems about unreasonable or improper system design to which close attention has been paid in the law circle, there is also another problem which is quite prominent but ignored by current scholars, i.e., the logic self-consistency of the trust law, mainly reflected in conflict or contradiction with each other or rules being not unified. The self consistent logic is one of the most basic standards measuring whether the law is perfect. Lack of legal logic self consistency will not only affect its scientific nature, but also have impact on the orderly and effective adjustments of social life. Therefore, logic self-consistency of China Trust Law should be e valued in the academic and legislative circles.