试论中国管理研究的话语权问题

新中国成立以后,中国管理研究与实践经历了3个阶段,其话语权经历了从萌芽到催生到完全西化的演进过程.西方管理学在中国的话语权可以解构为:引领学术共同体的学者;先入为主成为管理理论的主流;自诩为普世的管理学理论;控制大量国际学术期刊;借力强势组织管理实践活动;扩散和推广其研究方法与范式;依托国际化的英语语言等.当前,需要统筹"中国管理的理论"与"中国的管理理论"2条研究路线,在争取话语权利的同时,提升自己的话语能力,并以国内话语权的建构为切入点,继而争取国际话语权.在此过程中,要借助一切可以借助的力量,在学者个体话语权和中国管理研究集体话语权2个方面齐头并进,坚持问题导向的本土化研究思路,通过理论研究与组织管理实践的共同努力,最终重构中国管理研究的话语权.

On Power of Discourse of Chinese Management Research

After the foundation of new China, the research and practice for Chinese management have gone through three phases and its power of discourse has gone through the evolutional course from being sprouted to being formed, and to being fully westernized. The power of discourse of western management in China could be deconstructed into: the scholars leading academic community, being the mainstream of management theory by way of which first impressions are strongest, praising themselves the universal management theory, controlling a great deal of international academic journals, getting help from the mighty practice of organizational management in western country, diffusing and popularizing the research method and paradigm and relying on English that is the most international languages. Currently, we must not only plan the two research roads of "a Chinese theory of management" and "a theory of Chinese management" as a whole, and advance our capability of discourse at the same time fighting for domestic power of discourse, but also make the construction of domestic power of discourse as the cut edge to fight for international power of discourse. In this process, we must get help from every effort that could get, to advance side by side between scholar's individual power of discourse and collective power of discourse of Chinese management research, and then adhere to the train of thought of problem oriented indigenous research, to ultimately reconstruct the power of discourse of Chinese management research through the joint efforts of theoretical research and practice of organizational management in China.