首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论侦查违法行为的性质
引用本文:毛玮,胡汝为.论侦查违法行为的性质[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2005,45(2):80-84.
作者姓名:毛玮  胡汝为
作者单位:中山大学,法学院,广东,广州,510275
摘    要:刑讯逼供和超期羁押,是我国刑事诉讼制度中的两个难题.由于对侦查行为的定性错误,目前的法律仅仅在刑法、刑事诉讼法和国家赔偿法范围内解决刑讯逼供和超期羁押问题.从行政法学的角度来看,侦查是有关当局为提起诉讼而做出的行政行为,只有将刑讯逼供和超期羁押纳入行政诉讼等行政救济范围,才能扫除侦查救济制度中的理论和法律障碍.

关 键 词:刑讯逼供  超期羁押  侦查违法  拟制诉讼  司法审查  行政救济  
文章编号:1000-9639(2005)02-0080-05
收稿时间:2004-11-29
修稿时间:2004年11月29

On the Character of the Illegal Investigative Act
MAO Wei,HU Ru-wei.On the Character of the Illegal Investigative Act[J].Journal of Sun Yatsen University(Social Science Edition),2005,45(2):80-84.
Authors:MAO Wei  HU Ru-wei
Abstract:The inquisition by torture and the overtime custody are two severe problems of current criminal litigations in China. In the current legal system, these problems are doomed to be resolved via the criminal law, criminal procedure law and the state compensation law. Only when the inquisition by torture and the overtime custody are brought into the range of administrative remedy can one sweep the theoretical and law obstacles of inquisition remedy system. Thus administrative law will become the most effective instrument to countercheck the inquisition by torture and the overtime detention.
Keywords:inquisition by torture  overtime custody  illegal investigation act  artificial litigation  judicial review  administrative remedy
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号