《考槃余事》作者考辨

万历三十四年(1606)沈氏尚白斋所刻《考槃余事》四卷，署名明代文学家屠隆，后世学者多认同为屠氏著作而加以引证研究，然书中条目所论对象大多已经重见于前人之作。诸多证据表明，该书作者并非屠隆:其一，是书广泛截取旧作，巧加连缀，造为新编，乃有意作伪；其二，《考槃余事》行文风格与屠隆之文绝然不类；其三，屠隆缺少收藏赏鉴之条件与趣尚。藉此，可判定《考槃余事》应是伪托无疑，后之研究屠隆作品艺术以及思想观念，当谨言慎行而不可笃定为权威凭据。

A Criticism on the Authorship of Records for Insignificant Things of a Hermit

The four-volume edition of Insignificant Things of a Hermit, published by Still White Library in 1606, was signed Ming Dynasty writer Tu Long. Later scholars thought Insignificant Things of a Hermit as Tu Long''s work and studied it. However, the contents of this book have been mentioned by preceding writers. There is now a lot of evidence that Tu Long is not the author of Insignificant Things of a Hermit: First, many ideas in this book was borrowed and reformed, which is an intentional making of falseness. Second, the style of Tu Long''s writing is different from the style of Insignificant Things of a Hermit. Third, he doesn''t like and participate in the activities of collecting arts. From this, we can draw a conclusion that Insignificant Things of a Hermit is a pseudograph. Subsequent researchers should be careful to employ this book.