回归论文本位和学者本位的期刊论文评价模型创新——模糊综合评判法在SCI和CSSCI期刊论文评价中的应用

改革开放以来,SCI作为自然科学期刊的一种量化评价方法进入中国,随后在社会科学领域也出现了CSSCI。随着中国科学研究水平的进步,单纯量化评价方法的不足日益突显,引文索引开发者也出现了数据开发还是期刊评价的纠结。因此,运用更加科学合理的方法,量性分析与质性评价相结合,是弥补SCI与CSSCI作为评价工具之不足的有效途径。选取论文下载量、SCI分区、影响因子、学术影响力等四个指标,建立模糊综合评判模型,可以实现SCI期刊论文的可量化评价。在社会科学领域的期刊论文评价中,近年来先后出现了"以文评人"和"以文评刊"的探索,在归一化处理和一致性检验的基础上,同样可以实现对CSSCI期刊论文的科学评价,从而避免走入"以刊评文"的误区,使期刊论文评价更加科学合理并具有可执行性,进而回归学术研究的论文本位与学者本位。

Innovation of evaluation model of journal papers based on the regression of journal paper standard and scholar standard: An application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in SCI/CSSCI journal paper evaluation

Since the implementation of the reform and open policy, SCI has entered China as a quantitative evaluation method for natural science journals, and then CSSCI has emerged in the field of social sciences in China. With the improvement of the level of scientific research in China, the shortage of simple quantitative evaluation method is becoming more and more obvious, and the SCI/CSSCI developers have being entangled in the selection of data development or journal evaluation. Therefore, using more scientific and reasonable methods, i.e., combining quantitative analysis with qualitative assessment, is an effective way to make up for the deficiency of SCI and CSSCI as evaluation tools. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, which is established by means of four indexes involving the amount of paper downloading, SCI zoning, impact factors, academic influence, leads to the quantifiable evaluation of SCI journal papers. In the evaluation of journal papers in the field of social sciences, in recent years, there has been the exploration in "evaluating an author by papers" and then in "evaluating a journal by papers". Based on the normalization and consistency test, the scientific evaluation of CSSCI journal papers can be realized, which can avoid "evaluating a paper by journal" and make the evaluation of a journal paper more scientific, reasonable and executable, and then returning to paper standard and scholar standard in academic research.