首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The relative risk aversion hypothesis of educational choice
Authors:Richard Davies  Eskil Heinesen  Anders Holm
Institution:(1) Centre for Applied Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK (Fax: +44-1524-593429; e-mail: r.davies@lancaster.ac.uk), GB;(2) AKF, Institute of Local Government Studies, Nyropsgade 37, DK-1602 Copenhagen V, Denmark (Fax: +45-3315-2875; e-mail: esh@akf.dk), DK;(3) Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Linnésgade 22, DK-1361 Copenhagen K, Denmark (Fax: +45-3532-3940; e-mail: anders.holm@sociology.ku.dk), DK
Abstract:Analysing young people's educational choices, we derive and test implications of a relative risk aversion hypothesis: that educational choices are made so as to minimize the risk of ending up with a lower level of education than one's parents. These implications are in general different from what one would expect from human capital theory. We use a unique data set which combines data from administrative registers on young people's pathways through the educational system and their family background with survey data on their academic abilities at lower secondary school. The evidence is partly in favour of the relative risk aversion hypothesis. Received: 19 August 1999/Accepted: 10 January 2001 All correspondence to Eskil Heinesen. We are grateful to Karin Blix Mogensen and Martin B?g for excellent research assistance, and to two anonymous referees, John F. Ermisch, Martin Browning, Michael Rosholm, Paul Bingley, and participants at the conference of the European Society for Population Economics in Turin, 1999, for valuable comments and suggestions. Responsible editor: John F. Ermisch.
Keywords:JEL classification: I21  J24  J62
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号