| 岩崎与宫原“科学发现”思想述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 解恩泽.岩崎与宫原“科学发现”思想述评[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(1):10-15. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 解恩泽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 东北师范大学,科技哲学与交叉科学研究中心,吉林,长春,130021 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2001年国家社会科学基金项目(01BZX018) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 岩崎与宫原把科学发现分为实验、观察发现与理论发现两大类,并结合实例描述了由实验、观察发现到假说再到理论发现的过程.这些思想富有启发性,但从现代科学来看又过于简单,应上升到科学认识论的高度加以分析与认识.我国学者提出的"三场相说",这种潜科学认识演进模式能较好地说明科学发现的实质与全过程.
|
| 关 键 词： | 科学发现 实验、现察发现 理论发现 典型物质 三场相说 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7699(2004)01-0010-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年12月9日 |
The Commentary on Lwasaki and Miyabara's Thoughts of Scientific Discovery |
| |
| XIE En-ze.The Commentary on Lwasaki and Miyabara's Thoughts of Scientific Discovery[J].Journal of Shandong University of Sciences & Technology(Social Science),2004,6(1):10-15. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE En-ze |
| |
| Abstract: | Iwasaki and Miyabara think that the quantity and quality of scientific discovery mark the level of scientific development and the scientific discovery can be divided into two major types, experimental and observational discovery and theoretical discovery.They describe in combination with examples the process from experimental and observational discovery to hypothesis and to theory. These thoughts are instructive, but viewed from modern science, they are too simple and should be analyzed and recognized at a higher level of scientific cognition. The "Doctrine of Tree Field Phases", the evolutionary pattern of potential scientific cognition put forward by scholars of our country, can better explain the essential and overall process of scientific discovers. |
| |
| Keywords: | Scientific discovery experimental and observational discovery theoretical discovery typical substance doctrine of three field phases |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
