首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

跨境电子数据取证的困境与出路
引用本文:王志刚,张雪. 跨境电子数据取证的困境与出路[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 33(5): 45-54. DOI: 10.3979/1673-8268.2020113003
作者姓名:王志刚  张雪
作者单位:重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院,重庆400065
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目:网络犯罪追诉中的证据规则研究(19YJC820057)
摘    要:电子证据的获取成为有效打击跨境网络犯罪的关键所在,由于境内外法律制度的差异,容易造成跨境电子证据收集规则的不一,从而导致刑事司法协助难度加大.利用网络在线提取、网络远程勘验等单边跨境电子数据取证的方式可能会涉及侵犯他国的网络数据主权与国家主权,以及采取强制数据披露制度会使得权利人的合法权益受到侵犯的可能性增大等问题均给跨境电子数据取证带来了挑战.因此,需要在坚持国际刑事司法协助为主的取证方式下、在各国的不同立法中寻求达成国际刑事司法协助的平衡;设立不同的适用条件对单边跨境电子数据取证进行规制,以维护各国的网络数据主权和国家主权;在加强全球数据自由流动的情形下,完善数据披露制度,保障权利人的合法权益.

关 键 词:电子数据  司法协助  单边跨境取证  数据披露  权利保障
收稿时间:2020-11-30
修稿时间:2021-06-15

The Dilemma and Outlet of Cross-border Electronic Data Forensics
WANG Zhigang,ZHANG Xue. The Dilemma and Outlet of Cross-border Electronic Data Forensics[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications:Social Science Edition, 2021, 33(5): 45-54. DOI: 10.3979/1673-8268.2020113003
Authors:WANG Zhigang  ZHANG Xue
Affiliation:School of Cyber Security and Information Law, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China
Abstract:The acquisition of electronic evidence has become the key to effectively combating cross-border cybercrimes. Due to the differences in domestic and foreign legal systems, it is easy to cause differences in cross-border electronic evidence collection rules, which makes criminal judicial assistance more difficult. However, the use of online extraction, remote network inspection and other unilateral cross-border electronic data collection methods may involve infringement of the network data sovereignty and national sovereignty of other countries; and the adoption of compulsory data disclosure system will increase the possibility of infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of obliges. All these issues have brought challenges to cross-border electronic data forensics. Therefore, it is necessary to seek the balance of international criminal judicial assistance in the different legislations of various countries while adhering to the international criminal judicial assistance-based evidence collection method. Different applicable conditions should also be established to regulate unilateral cross-border electronic data collection so as to safeguard the network data sovereignty and national sovereignty of all countries. And in the context of strengthening the free flow of global data, data disclosure system should be improved to protect the legitimate rights and interests of rights holders.
Keywords:electronic data  judicial assistance  unilateral cross-border evidence collection  data disclosure  rights protection
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号