无法还原的历史——“十七年文学”研究的历史症结

吴秀明认为,对"十七年文学"应作综合整体评价。它既是20世纪中国的"十七年文学",也是具有三千年悠久历史的中国的"十七年文学",同时也是与当时政治、经济、文化密切关联,并高度一体化了的"十七年文学"。张光芒认为,不能用硬性的价值尺度来评判"十七年文学",应该综合那个时代的文化生态,以"同情的理解",作为历史叙述的前提,尤其应对生长于时代夹缝中的富有文化启蒙意义的文学作品,作出价值重估。董之林则进一步指出了"十七年文学"研究的复杂性与艰难性,这是无法还原的历史,任何简单的评判都将失去意义,只有跳出预设的思维定式,借助理性的"知识考古",才能达到评判的意义重构。黄健则揭示了"十七年文学"与现代性重构的内在联系,从现代性重建的视角反思"十七年文学"的得失与应有的价值。

Value Reconstruction and General Valuation of "the Seventeen Years' Literature" (Symposium)

Wu Xiuming holds that the "seventeen years' literature" must be generally revaluated.It belongs not only to the 20th century China,but also to the whole Chinese history.Zhang Guangmang holds that the "seventeen years' literature" should be valued with the cultural ecology of that time and by a "sympathetic understanding" as the premise of historical narration.Dong zhilin points out that there are complexity and difficulty in the studies of the "seventeen years' literature".She believes that it is an un-resuming history,and requires no simple judgment.The reconstruction of its meaning can be achieved only by a rational "archaeology of knowledge".Huang Jian reveals the internal relationship between that the "seventeen years' literature" and a reconstruction of modernity for a reflection of its success and failure,as well as its innate value.