首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

反贪侦查中非法证据排除规则的现实应对
引用本文:刘宗武. 反贪侦查中非法证据排除规则的现实应对[J]. 成都理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 0(5): 22-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0539.2015.05.005
作者姓名:刘宗武
作者单位:广东省佛山市高明区人民检察院,广东 佛山,528500
摘    要:新刑事诉讼法在总结实践经验的基础上进一步规范和完善了我国非法证据排除规则。该规则的确立和应用将对反贪侦查工作带来巨大的影响和挑战,也将对办案人员的素质提出更高的要求。要保障反贪侦查工作依法、持续、健康开展,就必须对非法证据排除规则进行理智辩证的对待、认真细致的研究和积极主动的应对。以章国锡受贿案为透视,提出了在反贪侦查工作中,严格执行收集证据的禁止性规定,全面落实全程同步录音录像制度,提高侦查人员出庭作证的应对能力,建立非法证据排除的预警机制和做好证据的事后补正等应对非法证据排除规则之对策。

关 键 词:反贪侦查  非法证据  非法证据排除规则  现实应对

Practical Measures of the Illegal Evidence Exclusionary Rules in the Anti-Corruption Investigation
Abstract:The new criminal procedure law on the basis of practical experience to further standardize and improve the illegal evidence exclusionary rules in china.The establishment and application of the rules will bring the enormous challenge and impact on anti-corruption investigation work, will also be on the case handling personnel quality put forward higher requirements.In order to safeguard the anti-corruption investigation work in accordance with the law,the sustainable and healthy development it is necessary to study on the exclusionary rules of illegal evidence for rational dialectical treatment, careful and proactive response to.In the Zhang Guoxi bribery case perspective,put forward to collect evidence prohibited strictly enforced anti-corruption investigation work,the full implementation of synchronized audio and video recording of the whole course system,improve the ability to deal with the investigators to testify in court,the establishment of early warning mechanism of illegal evidence exclusion and good evidence ex post correction to deal with illegal evidence exclusion rules of countermeasures.
Keywords:anti-corruption investigation  illegal evidence  illegal evidence exclusionary rules  practical measures
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号