首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

司法能动下的限度--论指导性案例在检察工作中的适用
引用本文:马文,范艳利.司法能动下的限度--论指导性案例在检察工作中的适用[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2015(5):12-16.
作者姓名:马文  范艳利
作者单位:1. 厦门大学 法学院,福建 厦门,361005;2. 厦门市集美区人民检察院,福建 厦门,361021
摘    要:基于对司法能动主义的争议和我国检察案例指导工作的特点,在适用指导性案例时应遵从一定的限制性规则:适用的前提是穷尽制定法;适用案件范围要遵循《最高人民检察院关于案例指导工作的规定》;在程序上由主办检察官提出适用,查明案例时应当区分必要事实和非必要事实,在正式的法律文书中应当标明所适用的具体指导性案例,并健全检察机关司法文书公开制度。

关 键 词:指导性案例  司法能动主义  适用  限度

The Limits of Judicial Activism:Research on Application of Guiding Cases in Procuratorial Work
Abstract:Because of the controversy of the judicial activism and the features of guiding cases in procuratorial work,the application of guiding cases should be restricted to comply with certain rules.The premise is having no statue law and the application scope should follow “provisions of Supreme People’s Procuratorate on guiding cases”.Procedural requirements are as follows:whether the guiding cases should be applied is determined by the procurators directing cases;the necessary facts and non essential facts should be distinguished when finding out the guiding cases;the specific applicable guiding cases should be marked in the formal legal documents.At the same time,the legal document public system of procuratorial organ should be improved.
Keywords:guiding cases  judicial activism  application  limits
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号